The Debt-Free Graduate Argument
No, I’m not talking about Murray Baker’s long-running franchise. I’m talking about the argument that having indebted graduates is a drag on the economy. It goes like this: indebted graduates consume less than debt-free graduates because they are repaying their loans. If they had fewer loans, they’d spend more money, with inevitable multiplier effects on the economy. Hence less student debt = more economic growth. (For an example of this thinking, see here). While this certainly sounds attractive, it ignores something important: