Category: Research

Is Research Getting Harder

I was reading through Paula Stephan’s How Economics Shapes Science – which is, by the way, an utterly fantastic book for anyone who wants to understand how universities actually work – when I came across this interesting little table. Average Number of Co-authors per Paper Over the space of nearly 20 years, the average number of co-authors per article has increased across all fields of study, albeit not uniformly (the effect seems bigger in the physical sciences). But why is this happening

Read More »

Public Research or Risky Research?

Why do we pay for research from the public purse, exactly? As I wrote a few weeks ago, it wasn’t always the case. It was only after American scientists working in universities demonstrated how their knowledge and skills could contribute to national security that the idea really took off. Fifteen years later, two American economists came to provide a dollars-and cents rationale for public funding of research. In 1959, Richard Nelson argued that the private sector was likely to underinvest in

Read More »

Prizes for Excellence

I wrote recently about using prizes as a way to distribute research money. More generally, though, prizes have a lot of potential as a way for governments to influence institutional behavior and create a more diverse higher education sector, and deserve to be given a lot more thought by policymakers. The reason for this is that we desperately need a more diverse set of incentives in our system. When politicians moan about how universities “aren’t responsive,” they are getting it precisely backwards;

Read More »

A Response to Critics

So, we’ve been hearing a number of criticisms – both directly and via the grapevine – of the research rankings we released last week. (Warning: if you’re not entranced by bibliometric methodology, you can safely skip today’s post). The main point at issue is that at some schools, our staff counts appear to be on the high side. Based on this, some schools have inferred that we are judging them too harshly – that if we had fewer observations, the denominator would

Read More »

Too Much Peer Review?

One way in which Canada stands out internationally in higher education is our ultra-reliance on individual peer review as a means of allocating research funding. While peer review is in many ways the “gold standard” of research assessment mechanisms, it has the drawback of being incredibly time-consuming, both for the applicant and for the assessors. What’s the alternative, though? Well, as Paula Stephan points out in her quite excellent book How Economics Shape Science, there are a number of ways that

Read More »