What Students Really Pay

In a couple of weeks, Statistics Canada will publish its annual Tuition and Living Accommodation Cost (TLAC) survey, which is an annual excuse to allow the usual suspects to complain about tuition fees.  But sticker price is only part of the equation: while governments and institutions ask students to pay for part of the educational costs, they also find ways to lessen the burden through subsidies like grants, loan remission, and tax expenditures.  And Statscan never bothers to count that stuff.

Today, we at HESA are releasing a publication called The Many Prices of Knowledge: How Tuition and Subsidies Interact in Canadian Higher Education.  Unlike any previous publication, it looks not just at a single sticker price, but rather at the many different possible prices that students face depending on their situation.  We take ten student cases (e.g. first-year dependent student in college, family income = $80,000; married university student, spousal income = $40,000; etc.), and we examine how much each student would be able to receive in grants, tax credits, and loan remission in each of the ten provinces.  It thus allows us to compare up-front net tuition (i.e. tuition minus grants) and all-inclusive net tuition (i.e. tuition minus all subsidies) not just across provinces, but also across different students within a single province.

Some nuggets:

  • On average, a first-year, first-time student attending university direct from high-school, with a family income of $40,000 or less receives $63 more in subsidies than they pay in tuition, after all subsidies – including graduate rebates – are accounted for (i.e. they pay net zero tuition on an all-inclusive basis).  If they attend college, they receive roughly $1,880 more in subsidies than they pay in tuition (i.e. -$1800 tuition);
  • A first-year, first-time student attending university from a family with $40K in Quebec, after all government subsidies, pays -$393 in all-inclusive net tuition.  In Ontario, the same student pays -$200.  But if we were to include institutional aid, the student in Ontario would likely be the one better off, since students in Ontario with entering averages over 80% regularly get $1,000 entrance awards, while students in Quebec tend not to.  For some students at least, Ontario is cheaper than Quebec;
  • On average, college students who are also single parents receive something on the order of $11,000 in non-repayable aid – that is, about $8,500 over and above the cost of tuition.   In effect, it seems to be the policy of nearly all Canadian governments to provide single parents with tuition plus the cost of raising kids in non-repayable aid, leaving the student to borrow only for his/her own living costs.

The upshot of the study is that Canada’s student aid system is indeed generous: in none of our case studies did we find a student who ended up paying more than 62% of the sticker price of tuition when all was said and done, and most paid far less.  But if that’s the case, why are complaints about tuition so rife?

Two reasons, basically.  First, Canada’s aid system may be generous, but it is also opaque.  We don’t communicate net prices effectively to students because institutions, the provinces, and Ottawa each want to get credit for their own contributions.  If you stacked all the student aid up in a comprehensible single pile, no one would get credit.  And we can’t have that.

The second reason is that Canada only provides about a third of its total grant aid at the point where students pay tuition fees.  Nearly all the rest, stupidly, arrives at the end of a year of studies.  More on that tomorrow.

Posted in

5 responses to “What Students Really Pay

  1. Q: But if that’s the case, why are complaints about tuition so rife?
    A: Because of what you get in return.

  2. Sure, today that is the case for first-degree students. Ten years ago it was not. Tuition levels were almost on par with where they are today, while aid was stuck in the 90s. I had a 94% entrance average and maintained an A average all through university. My parents made $50k. I lived away from home, had no RESPs and minimal parental support, and got $3k per year in aid. The year after I did a $1k work study to supplement that aid, I was deemed ineligible for aid. My parents would not cosign for a bank loan, so I financed my education from the bank of Mastercard.

    Despite doing a science degree, I studied the “wrong” kind of science (molecular biology – silly me for believing we have a life sciences industry in Canada!). I could not afford grad school and worked for a few years, but realized I am stuck in admin roles that are a poor fit for my personality and make no use of my strong analytical skills. I’m trying to go back to school to become an engineer. Apparently Canada is desperate for engineers. So desperate that we charge students $10k tuition to become one.

    As a second-degree student, I am ineligible for a 30% tuition rebate and for the vast majority of entrance scholarships and bursaries. Because I have an income (an almost liveable one aside from all those Mastercard “student loans” that eat up whatever doesn’t go to rent and food) I am not eligible for OSAP for my first year of school. Because of that Mastercard I am ineligible for a bank student loan. Maybe after first year I could qualify for an in-student scholarship or loan, or OSAP after not earning anything for a year, but there’s no way I can come up with that $10k tuition for the first year, and still make payments on that Mastercard, and rent, and food. That’s even after assuming I can earn $1,000 a month working at a well-paid part time job. Given the number of underemployed grads with degrees in arts, life sciences, social sciences, etc, I’m sure I’m hardly the only one wanting to go back and train to be something useful to society. Those of us with huge debt loads could really use a 30% tuition break.

    So Canada may have a skills shortage of engineers. I guess we’ll have to keep stealing them from other countries that could really use those brains, because we do nothing to help train the brains we already have.

  3. Perhaps the case now, but I am still paying off my 60k loan incurred 1998-2002. And I was one of those poor kids in Ontario under Harris having to collect social assistance while working menial jobs, as well as having to lie in order to complete the grade 13 required for uni entry (I paid that all back, too). Good times. Lot of talk of current students, but silence on those in older regimes.

    The upshot being that I can teach a full course load of 4-4 at 56k a year with no benefits to pay it all off. Who needs teeth anyway?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search the Blog

Enjoy Reading?

Get One Thought sent straight to your inbox.
Subscribe now.